Case Study: Art & Interpretive Element Review Panel – Collaborating Across Perspectives

Overview

In support of a major utility company’s flood mitigation project, a one-year Art & Interpretive Element Review Panel was formed to shape the public art and storytelling features of the project. What made this process unique was its intentional blend of Indigenous and non-Indigenous community members, brought together to reach a consensus-based recommendation—a level of collaboration rarely achieved in large infrastructure projects.

A Grounded and Inclusive Process

Rather than prioritizing resumes or affiliations, panelists were chosen for the perspectives they could bring and their openness to learn from others. Indigenous Nations with traditional ties to the area nominated community members, while other panelists were selected through a public call, with intentional outreach to youth, seniors, 2SLGBTQIA+ individuals, equity-deserving groups, and local community residents.

The group began by building relationships and trust, setting shared expectations for how they would work together. These included commitments to patience, curiosity, active listening, and working toward consensus with respect and care.

Navigating Challenges with Integrity

While the panel itself remained consistent throughout the year, organizational personnel changes introduced some challenges. New staff unfamiliar with the panel’s history occasionally caused confusion or inefficiencies, contributing to a delay of a couple of months. However, the shared values and strong foundation established early on kept the process on track.

Meaningful Outcomes

The panel’s final recommendation—endorsed by the company—was the result of true collaboration. Though the company retained final decision-making authority, they chose to accept the panel’s consensus recommendation, demonstrating a high degree of trust and respect. The decision reflects a richer outcome, shaped by diverse lived experiences and cultural worldviews.

This was the first time in the multi-year project that Indigenous and non-Indigenous community members were engaged together. Rather than creating division, this diversity led to a more thoughtful, inclusive outcome—one in which participants were motivated not only to share their views, but to ensure others’ interests were reflected too.